Dan Kimball is asking a great question: What do “complementarian” Christians (those who believe that women should assume places of submission – at least within church bodies) have to say about Sarah Palin?
Obviously, she lines up with them on most of the political issues but… from the complementarian perspective, she is also – shall we say – anatomically deficient (?) when it comes to being qualified for certain positions of authority.
Great observation from Dan – and some great comments that follow after his post. Interestingly enough, what it tends to do is draw out are multiple “shades” and variations on the complementarian perspective.
